|
24 Hr. Hotline
|
|||||||||||
|
|
African-American Studies
Aging
Agriculture
American Studies and History
Archaeology and Anthropology
Architecture
Art History
Asian Studies
Aviation, Aeronautics
Biography
Biology
Book Reports
Business
Canadian Studies and Issues
Chemistry
Child Abuse, Youth Issues
Communication Studies
Comparative Literature
Criminal Justice, Legal Issues,
Censorship, Policy
Dentistry
Economics
Education
Engineering, Construction
Environmental Studies and Ecology
European Studies
Film Studies
Food, Diet & Nutrition
Gender and Sexuality
Geography
Globalization
Labor Studies
Literature
Mathematics
Music Studies
Mythology and Folk Lore
Native-American Studies
Nursing, Healthcare
Philosophy
Political Science
Popular Culture
Psychoanalysis
Psychology
Race Studies (Racism, Hate Crimes)
Science and Technology
Shakespeare, William
Sociology
Sports
Theology and Religion Studies
Tourism, Hospitality Services
Urban Studies
Women's Studies
World History and Culture
Writing
Zoology






|
An Argument against a One World Soul using Aquinas' 76th Question of the Summa Theologica as a model. St. Thomas Aquinas, in question 76 of the Summa Theologica, argues for and convinces the reader of the existence of one universal intellect. Our modern translation of this might be Jung's description of archetypal knowledge. When the argument is dissected, it is difficult to refute the idea that all of humanity shares enough commonalities of temperament, instinct, desire and need that the reality of a universal intellect, a shared oneness, is not hard to accept. There is enough of a commonality of human experience that, separate from religion or any other delimiting factor, we can readily see that, independent of God, humanity universally prefers some things to others (pleasure to pain, comfort to discomfort, satiety to hunger, security to danger). These are representatives of our inner innate drives and exist whether we perceive a single unifying God, multiple Gods, or no God at all. The fact that the Atheist and the Catholic both prefer the same things mentioned above indicates that the intellect is separate from the soul and from God. The argument over the existence of a universal Soul, however, takes on a much different element. There are three arguments for the existence of a universal soul, and there are three counter arguments which will, it is hoped, demonstrate that unlike a universal intellect, each person maintains their own individual and wholly unique soul. The question, then, being pondered is, whether the soul is multiplied according to the number of bodies.
|
We Proudly Accept
![]()
Term Papers - Buy Term Papers - Buy College Custom Term Papers Online- APA Format Term Papers - MLA Style Term Papers
© Copyright. The Paper Experts Inc. All text, images, tags and design of this site are property of The Paper Experts Inc. Our service is intended to help students improve their marks not help them cheat. We are a service that writes term papers as models or guides to be used by students in creating their own original work. Anytime you use our ideas or words you are required to properly attribute credit to The Paper Experts Inc. If you would like to inform yourself on this matter please contact us and ask. All works written by us remain our property. We are always happy to help students improve and succeed in their academic endeavors
Term Papers - Buy Term Papers - Buy College Custom Term Papers Online - APA Format Term Papers - MLA Style Term Papers




Essay Writing Prices